- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
I suspect the people at NASA are the gatekeepers of reality. They are ancient Egypt. For this reason I trust in what they are doing. I think their 'official' agenda is and always has been complete bullshit but if you pay attention it's easy to figure out what they are really up to. Like everything, it's all metaphor, and it all comes back to ancient Egypt. If the Illuminati exists, they run NASA.
At first glance this looks like a balancing act.
interesting, but if The Illuminati run NASA, should we really be accepting their schemes? Now they're “touching up” the moon landing video because they've conveniently recorded over the original tapes.
I suspect the people at NASA are the gatekeepers of reality. They are ancient Egypt. For this reason I trust in what they are doing. I think their 'official' agenda is and always has been complete bullshit but if you pay attention it's easy to figure out what they are really up to. Like everything, it's all metaphor, and it all comes back to ancient Egypt. If the Illuminati exists, they run NASA.
At first glance this looks like a balancing act.
interesting, but if The Illuminati run NASA, should we really be accepting their schemes? Now they're “touching up” the moon landing video because they've conveniently recorded over the original tapes.
From my position down here it seems silly to argue with people who do shit in space. I'm not really into conspiracies, I just think they know a lot more than they are letting on, which is probably essential at this point.
maybe we should mine the moon before we bomb it. we could make trillions and trillions of soda cans i bet.
Going the find the Monolith I bet.
Buzz Aldrin punching a conspiracy theorist filmmaker in the face:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUI36tPKDg4
Article about the conspiracy:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/07/17/moon.landing.hoax/index.html
Or perhaps NASA and the New York Times know that using the term “bombing” would not be a popular tactic. However, when you read their articles they describe techniques like “payload” and “the impact will eject material from the crater’s surface to create a plume.” Hmm, sounds like an explosion to me. It's basic rhetoric! And I hardly would call Scientific American “sensationalist”.
love RAW so much…
There's a huge archive of interviews from him at http://deoxy.org/raw.htm
Can't really express what this man has done for me.
At first i thought this thread was just another link to a Mr.Show skit…
At first i thought this thread was just another link to a Mr.Show skit…
“this is the moon blowing up, and this is me smiling”
LOL
NASA Discovers Large Lunar Ice Field
Posted: 7:52 am PST November 13, 2009Updated: 9:27 am PST November 13, 2009
MOFFETT FIELD, Calif. — NASA announced Friday the discovery of a large field of ice on the moon.Just weeks after NASA's Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (L-CROSS) mission analyzed a plume of debris generated by the impact of a satellite into a crater near the moon's south pole, scientists said the findings suggest the presence of frozen water at the site of impact.
Over the last decade, scientists have found some hints of underground ice on the moon's poles, but this is the best evidence yet.
